What's new
Old Chevelles

Welcome to OldChevelles.com, built by Auto Enthusiasts for Auto Enthusiasts. Cars are not our only interests so please feel free to post about any subject the community might enjoy or you just feel you need to air.

We respect free speech and constructive dialogue however we don't allow threatening talk against members, nudity, or pornography. Threads are monitored and trolls are not tolerated.

This site is completely free and there are no costs. Please enjoy and provide feedback.
  • We've enabled the website app for anyone who wants to use it on a mobile or desktop device.

  • We've changed the header logo to display our Member's Cars.

    If you'd like your car to show up there, go to the forum Site Bugs & Feature Requests and post your image in the "Member's Car Pictures for the Header Logo" and we'll add your car into the lineup.

Short Water Pump Brackets and Pulleys for 65-68 396

Nashville Cat

Veteran Member
Senior Member
I will start with some great info from Bruce, a Team Chevelle member screen name "AZcamino".
He has a 67 El Camino and knows a lot about power steering brackets.

Bruce says current repros are based off 68 C10's and are about 3/4" too long and too high.
Here are his recommendations to modify the PS lower bracket to make it like original :

1st post
I would cut a 3/4" wide section out of the center and reweld it.


1692064430637.jpeg

I previously posted, showing where to cut 3/4 inch to shorten the longer bracket. I tried that today and 3/4 inch is good in the x axis, but it is more complicated than that.
The mounting pivot also needs to be moved in the y axis, to get the pump low enough to clear the lower alternator bracket and get full belt adjustment inwards. I am going to
make that modification tomorrow.

Here is a photo of what it looks like right now compared to the OEM Chevelle bracket.


1692065053088.png

Bruce's drawing shows where the current changes need to be made.
The orange outline is where the OEM Chevelle bracket should be.


1692064763528.jpeg


I cut and bent the bracket this morning and checked the dimensions with my template. I will weld the gap and check the fit on my chassis.
Mission accomplished !
The modified 68 Chevelle/pickup bracket now fits the same as the OEM lower bracket, with full adjustment and clearance to the lower alternator bracket.
I measured a belt size range of 50 to 52 inches.
Alternator and PS now have proper clearance

1692065645521.jpeg
 
Info about how the rear PS pump bracket attaches :

1692067840992.jpeg

The rear bracket attaches to the same bolt at the rear of the lower alternator bracket

1692067892859.jpeg
 
Talking about crank pulleys :

This is an original crank pulley 3874414. It's a two row pulley used with C60 air conditioning.
A third row pulley is added in front of this one with N40 power steering : 3874416.


1692069371980.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Good info, wish I had known. I used the truck bracket and made it work, but it was tight. I think I did some tweeking, but no outright refab. I had a pressure hose in stock for another app. and since it was a budget build, just used it. The fix would have been get the proper hose, and refab the bracket. My hose extends upward 2 inches which forces the pump to be a bit higher than where it should. So, when you buy the hose, makes sure it's the correct one which a tight 120* right from the steering box.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230814_201028_1CS.jpg
    IMG_20230814_201028_1CS.jpg
    127 KB · Views: 2
  • IMG_20230814_201034.jpg
    IMG_20230814_201034.jpg
    112.5 KB · Views: 2
Here is a chart of pulley part numbers for big blocks 66-68
C60 = air conditioning
N40 = power steering
L34 396 was rated at 350 hp in 1967, down from 360 in 66 (probably for insurance reasons)
L35 was the lowest 325 hp version


1692069779838.png
 
Last edited:
Talking about Water Pump pulleys :

All 66 - 68 396's which had power steering and air conditioning had this water pump pulley : 3908920.
It has 3 grooves ; the outer groove is for the smog pump which 99% of owners threw away :)

Pics of my 3 groove 3908920 pulley


1692073584698.jpeg

1692073642817.jpeg
 
There was a lengthy discussion recently on TC regarding pulleys for a ‘67. This is good info!

Btw, Bruce’s Elco is a ‘66 not a ‘67. He’s really a perfectionist and a good guy! His El Camino is on hold for awhile with him restoring his ‘62? Vette currently.
 
A nice pic of a non-ac pulley setup. Notice the crank pulley has 2 grooves; the 3rd groove for ac would normally be in the center

1692398000719.png
 
That crank pulley is 2 piece, the one closest to the block is standard, the outer is the ad on. They have 3 male/female interface locator thingys.
 
That crank pulley is 2 piece, the one closest to the block is standard, the outer is the ad on. They have 3 male/female interface locator thingys.
Here's a pic of that 2 piece, 2 groove crank setup
This is the flat pulley with the locating rings; it mounts in the back.

1692407887111.jpeg

Flat pulley is 3755820 and dished is 3751232

1692408039977.jpeg

Assembled :

1692408092048.jpeg
 
When I added power steering to my last '68 BB, those pulleys were out of sight price wise. I found an aftermarket billet 3 groove that was an exact repalcement for half the price, and painted it black. No issues with it.
 
When I added power steering to my last '68 BB, those pulleys were out of sight price wise. I found an aftermarket billet 3 groove that was an exact repalcement for half the price, and painted it black. No issues with it.
Price is definitely a factor but I found OEM pulleys for about the same, maybe a little more.
I think I paid $120 for the crank pulley - 2 pulleys that locked together and had 3 grooves for ac and ps.
For me, I won't spend a fortune, but I want the engine to look as close to stock as possible.
Popping the hood and working on the same engine I did at 20 years old ? I love it.
 
Last edited:
At the time I was looking, those two pulleys were close to $200, and the billet one was $40. Once painted, it would have taken a magifying glass to tell. But I built that car on an almost zero budget, out of necessity at that time. I've spent a LOT more freely on the '70 Elky that I'm building now!
 
Top Bottom