He did the same thing with cuisanartvette......this mod has an agenda, real apparent.
Welcome to OldChevelles.com, built by Auto Enthusiasts for Auto Enthusiasts. Cars are not our only interests so please feel free to post about any subject the community might enjoy or you just feel you need to air.
We respect free speech and constructive dialogue however we don't allow threatening talk against members, nudity, or pornography. Threads are monitored and trolls are not tolerated.
This site is completely free and there are no costs. Please enjoy and provide feedback.He did the same thing with cuisanartvette......this mod has an agenda, real apparent.
Okay, this guy keeps spreading, dare I say, "misinformation". Someone with access please call him out on this as I have several times in the past concerning this subject. Tell him it's coming from me, so it rattles him a bit. The '69 Super Sport from the Baltimore plant has been verified in countless trim tag examples, with only 1 known anomoly. It's spelled out in Dale McIntosh' book, Jim Brady's accounts, Rick Nelson's accounts, Chris White's accounts, and mine. Yet, virtually every time this topic comes up, Dean is quick to debunk the "L" code based on "known examples to the contrary".....meaning 1. There is a prospective buyer basing his evaluation on a '69 that could be lead astray if he listens to Dean, who knows very little other than what his own car presents. Again, he has an agenda, not sure why, but I can't debate him this time. The thread is under "about to pull the trigger on a '69, questions".
No I don't see the difference.No absolutes, please read and understand. You're going on a tangent, nobody is calling the anomolies clones. You take that first step, then, based on what you've learned, take another. It's critical thinking. I feel comfortable authenticating a '69 and yes, I'd put my reputation on anything I've claimed. See the difference?
but there aren't tons.No I don't see the difference.
If SS's had the L and there are tons that don't then they must be clones or copo's.
If you need to rely on "other" facts that the car is an SS to reach that conclusion, then the L theory doesn't hold much.
Am I making sense?